agenpro2 trouble

[Frank Fock]

Hi Rich,

Did you generate your subagent with the
subagent template? It seems that you either
have used the master or the regular template.

Also generating code for the basic SNMP-MIBs
like SNMPv2-CONF and SNMPv2-SMI is not
useful.

Best regards,
Frank

Richard Coco wrote:
> I am attempting to use agenpro2 to generate a sub-agent.
> I believe I have correctly imported MIBs, ets properties, etc.
> 
> I am able to 'generate' without error.
> However, I cannot successfully compile:
> 
> racoco: make -f Makefile.linux
> rm -f  agent.o
> g++ -g -Wall -c -o agent.o -I../include -I../../../include -I../../../../agent++/include -I../../../../snmp++/include -I../../../../snmp++/src agent.cpp
> In file included from agent.cpp:37:
> module_init.h: In function `void Agentpp::module_init (const OctetStr
> &, Agentpp::SubAgentXMib *)':
> module_init.h:15: no matching function for call to
> `Agentpp::snmpv2_conf::snmpv2_conf (const OctetStr &,
> Agentpp::SubAgentXMib *&)'
> ../include/snmpv2_conf.h:48: candidates are:
> Agentpp::snmpv2_conf::snmpv2_conf ()
> ../include/snmpv2_conf.h:52:
> Agentpp::snmpv2_conf::snmpv2_conf (const Agentpp::snmpv2_conf &)
> module_init.h:16: no matching function for call to
> `Agentpp::snmpv2_smi::snmpv2_smi (const OctetStr &,
> Agentpp::SubAgentXMib *&)'
> ../include/snmpv2_smi.h:48: candidates are:
> Agentpp::snmpv2_smi::snmpv2_smi ()
> ../include/snmpv2_smi.h:52:
> Agentpp::snmpv2_smi::snmpv2_smi (const Agentpp::snmpv2_smi &)
> make: *** [agent.o] Error 1
> racoco:
> 
> I have imported the SNMPv2-CONF mib
> Here is a piece of the generated file snmpv2_conf.h.
> 
> 
>      45 class snmpv2_conf: public MibGroup
>      46 {
>      47   public:
>      48         snmpv2_conf();
>      49         virtual ~snmpv2_conf() { }
>      50 //--AgentGen BEGIN=snmpv2_conf
>      51 //--AgentGen END
>      52 };
>      53
> 
> 
> You can see it does not define a prototype for the
> two constructors mentioned in the above compiler error message.
> 
> why not? What am I not doing right? What am i not understanding?
> 
> Any help is appreciated.
> 
> 
> thanks,
> 
> - rich
> 
>