[AGENT++] re: Making Find() virtual in MibTable

[Frank Fock]

Hi Santosh,

Of course you can change the library to use a virtual find method, however
I would not recommend using MibTable that way. It will be hard to get
every mechanism to be "virtual" (think about snmpRowStatus etc.).

If you want to implement a table without at least caching requested rows in
a MibTable, then I recommend using MibComplexEntry as base class.
An example for such an implementation is the AGENT++Win32 subagent
DLL class.

Hope this helps.

Best regards,
Frank

santosh.agarwal at wipro.com wrote:

>There have a requirement to override the find() method of MibTable.
>Since we do not have a local DB in memory for the MibTable and using a
>remote database, we need to have a specific logic of find w.r.t. to our
>implememtion. Can the find() be make virtual so that the find to the
>derieved class ( MibTable- >  AgentXSharedTable ->MyTable:: find() get
>invoked when the entry pointer has the object reference to MyTable
>
>
>
>
>Changes  required to the framework file mib.cpp.
>
>
>
>
>Santosh
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Confidentiality Notice
>
>
>The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended
>for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
>you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at Wipro or Mailadmin at wipro.com immediately
>and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
>_______________________________________________
>AGENTPP mailing list
>AGENTPP at agentpp.org
>http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/agentpp
>
>
>  
>


-- 
AGENT++
http://www.agentpp.com
http://www.mibexplorer.com
http://www.mibdesigner.com