[AGENT++] Agent's not responding to manager's request/

[Dario maljur]

Yes that was my point. The columnar objects would have their's representing
row.

 

  _____  

From: Bob Natale [mailto:bob.natale at appliedsnmp.com] 
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 7:58 PM
To: Dario maljur
Cc: agentpp at agentpp.org
Subject: Re: [AGENT++] Agent's not responding to manager's request/

 

Hi Dario,

Your comments below *appear* to indicate a misapplication of the text your
quoted...?

In fact, the "manager" (command generator in current parlance) would append
"0" as the last subid (i.e., the instance identifier) only if the target
object were in fact a "scalar" object, i.e., not a "columnar" object --
i.e., to distinguish a discrete object from any contained in a MIB table.

Cheers,
BobN

-----Original Message-----
From: Dario maljur [mailto:dmaljur at elma.hr]
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 07:58 AM
To: agentpp at agentpp.org
Subject: [AGENT++] Agent's not responding to manager's request/

Hi all.

RFC 2578 in section 7 states:

The OBJECT-TYPE macro is used to define a type of managed object. It
should be noted that the expansion of the OBJECT-TYPE macro is
something which conceptually happens during implementation and not
during run-time.

For leaf objects which are not columnar objects (i.e., not contained
within a conceptual table), instances of the object are identified by
appending a sub-identifier of zero to the name of that object.
Otherwise, the INDEX clause of the conceptual row object superior to
a columnar object defines instance identification information.



Witch, if I understand it correctly, means that manager adds .0 at the and
of MIB managed object

To distinguish table objects from other values.

But The Agent I wrote doesn't respond to the oid if the 0 Is added. How to
correct this? 

_______________________________________________
AGENTPP mailing list
AGENTPP at agentpp.org
http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/agentpp