[AGENT++] Minimum footprint
michael.carr at bt.com
michael.carr at bt.com
Thu May 10 17:46:59 CEST 2007
Thanks Henning, any further thoughts on what the other flag(s) were? There is one to disable SNMPv3 support - _NO_SNMPv3 - but I'd rather try to keep that in if possible.
Anyone else have any other suggestions?
Thanks,
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Eggers, Henning [mailto:Henning.Eggers at plath.de]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 10:47 AM
To: Carr,M,Michael,JGFTY C; agentpp at agentpp.org
Subject: AW: [AGENT++] Minimum footprint
If you leave out SNMPv3 and all the crypto stuff you will get a lot smaller, too. There is a define for that but I don't have it handy right now.
I tried that once for a microntroller and ended up implementing SNMPv1 and v2c myself because it just wouldn't fit, largely because of the C++-libs which were not used by any other program.
Actually, slightly OT, implementing SNMP for an agent in C showed me where the "simple" in the name holds true. The implementation was quite straight forward and I could even do withtout dynamic memory (malloc etc.).
Regards,
Henning
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: agentpp-bounces at agentpp.org
> [mailto:agentpp-bounces at agentpp.org] Im Auftrag von
> michael.carr at bt.com
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Mai 2007 08:18
> An: agentpp at agentpp.org
> Betreff: [AGENT++] Minimum footprint
>
> All,
>
> What options are available to get everything down to as small a size
> as possible?
>
> From a scan of the archives it looks like the #define _NO_LOGGING in
> config_snmp_pp.h can be uncommented out, are there any others?
>
> Cheers,
> Mike
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AGENTPP mailing list
> AGENTPP at agentpp.org
> http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/agentpp
>
>
More information about the AGENTPP
mailing list