[AGENT++] hidden overloaded virtual function index_allocated() for some shared table demos

[Frank Fock]

Hi Claus,

Jochen is right, when the index_allocation method was changed the
example has not been changed by error. The default parameters for
the 4th and 5th parameter saved the compatibility only for
calls of the method but not for overwritten methods from subclasses.

The index allocation thing has different causes, which I will comment
on with another email.

Best regards,
Frank

Am 23.11.2014 22:09, schrieb Claus Klein:
> Hi Jochen,
>
> thanks for your response, but not the warnings are important for me at the moment.
> I would like to understand the problems with shared tables and index allocation.
>
> Ether the ifTable example or the index allocation works. But never both!
>
> I think, that AgentXSharedTable::index_allocated() must be always called for shared tables.
> If not, the index was not allocated at master agent site and destroy row always fails!
>
> So adding the missing parameters is not the hole solution.
> This prevents only the compiler warning.
>
> Regards,
> Claus
>
>
> On 23.11.2014, at 21:49, Jochen Katz <katz at agentpp.com> wrote:
>
>> I also think, that this is not right. I assume that the API was changed
>> without updating the examples. These warnings will be fixed for the next
>> release.
>>
>> The other warnings (beside #pragma and unused variable) will also be fixed.
>>
>> Regards,
>>   Jochen
> _______________________________________________
> AGENTPP mailing list
> AGENTPP at agentpp.org
> https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/agentpp

-- 
---
AGENT++
Maximilian-Kolbe-Str. 10
73257 Koengen, Germany
https://agentpp.com
Phone: +49 7024 8688230
Fax:   +49 7024 8688231