From claus.klein at arcormail.de  Mon Apr  1 22:49:37 2019
From: claus.klein at arcormail.de (Claus Klein)
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 22:49:37 +0200
Subject: [AGENT++] Why is start_sync() is called without following
	end_snych()
Message-ID: <DE351D7B-6CD3-4567-875D-5DE158F50C04@arcormail.de>

Hi,

I do not know why this is only locked?

This may result in a deadlock while call Synchronized::~Synchronized().

MibEntry::~MibEntry()
{
    start_synch(); // exclusively get this object.
    // never unlock this object again.

    // explictly call clear() on this list, because it contains pointers
    // to other mib objects which we don't want to delete here
    notifies.clear();
}