[SNMP4J] java.io.InterruptedIOException: operation interrupted

Mathias Bogaert pathos at pandora.be
Fri Sep 24 09:50:01 CEST 2004


That's exactly what I do. All synchronous requests, and after that, 
close the transport mapping.

On 24 Sep 2004, at 00:32, Frank Fock wrote:

> Hi Mathias,
>
> When you call Snmp.close() you implicitly call close() on all
> associated transport mappings. Why do you call close() when
> you have oustanding requests?
>
> The only way to assure that you have waited for all time-outs
> is to use synchronous requests.
>
> Best regards,
> Frank
>
> Mathias Bogaert wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> When calling close() on the Snmp instance, I frequently get 10466042 
>> WARN  [Thread-903] (snmp4j.transport.DefaultUdpTransportMapping:193) 
>> - java.io.InterruptedIOException: operation interrupted.
>> What exactly does this mean? That the stack is stopping listening for 
>> any incoming messages? If so, how can I wait for all possibe 
>> time-outs to occur before closing the stack?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mathias Bogaert
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SNMP4J mailing list
>> SNMP4J at agentpp.org
>> http://p15141779.pureserver.info/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
>>
>
>
>
>




More information about the SNMP4J mailing list