[SNMP4J] A memory leak in MPv3.Cache?

[Frank Fock]

Hi Feyon,

You need to call Snmp.cancel(..) to remove a (asynchronous) request from
the "pendingRequest" table. See the JavaDoc for details.

Since I do not think that the below problem is critical, I will not 
provide a patch
for 1.0. The 1.1 release should be available early next week (if nothing 
unexpected
happens).

Best regards,
Frank

Feyon wrote:

>Hi Frank,
>
>I think there is the same problem with pendingRequests. May I know if a patch for
>version 1.0 will be available soon and what is your schedule for version 1.1?
>
>Best Regards,
>Feyon
>
>ÔÚÄúµÄÀ´ÐÅÖÐÔø¾­Ìáµ½:
>  
>
>>From:Frank Fock <fock at agentpp.com>
>>Reply-To: 
>>To: Feyon <yangfei at tsinghua.org.cn>
>>Subject: Re: [SNMP4J] A memory leak in MPv3.Cache?
>>
>>Hi Feyon,
>>
>>Yes, that is indeed a memory leak under such special situations.
>>Version 1.1 will be fool-proof here.
>>
>>Best regards,
>>Frank
>>
>>Feyon wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>hi,
>>>
>>>   Is there a memory leak in MPv3.Cache? When using v3 to access an nonexist
>>>address the cache increase its capacity continiously without deletEntry called.
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>
>>>Best Regards,
>>>Feyon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>SNMP4J mailing list
>>>SNMP4J at agentpp.org
>>>http://p15141779.pureserver.info/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>SNMP4J mailing list
>SNMP4J at agentpp.org
>http://p15141779.pureserver.info/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
>
>  
>