[SNMP4J] SNMP4J on Java.net!

[Frank Fock]

Hi Mathias,

30% is a strong figure. Is this really the overall performance
improvement? I would guess that a speed improvement of about
3% from Hashtable to ConcurrentHashMap would be a lot.
I thought SNMP4J does not spend that much time with Hashtables.

If this is true, I should consider replacing Hashtable by
Collections.synchronizedMap(new HashMap()).

Any comments?

Best regards,
Frank

Mathias Bogaert wrote:
> Yes,
> 
> And the new concurrency API...I replaced Hashtable with ConcurrentHashMap
> and got 30% better troughput.
> 
> Mathias
> 
>> Hi, what the main thing that java 1.5 improve
>> Generics, autoboxing, annotations ? Something else ?
>>
>> Matthieu
>>
>> 2006/4/20, Mathias Bogaert <m.bogaert at memenco.com>:
>>> Guys,
>>>
>>> I've imported SNMP4J 1.7 in the Java.net subversion. The idea is to
>>> move SNMP4J to JDK 1.5 with the help of the community.
>>>
>>> If anyone wants to contribute, please join the project.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Mathias
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SNMP4J mailing list
>>> SNMP4J at agentpp.org
>>> http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
>>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SNMP4J mailing list
> SNMP4J at agentpp.org
> http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j

-- 
AGENT++
http://www.agentpp.com
http://www.mibexplorer.com
http://www.mibdesigner.com