[SNMP4J] Improved table index
Frank Fock
fock at agentpp.com
Wed Feb 1 00:24:30 CET 2006
Hi again,
Frank Fock wrote:
> Hello Matthias,
>
> Matthias Wiesmann wrote:
>
>
>> One thing that strikes me in the code of this class is that there are
>> a lot of switches on the syntax of variables. It might make sense to
>> move the index building functionality directly into the different
>> subclasses of Variable, maybe with methods like:
>>
>> void fromIndex(OID index) ;
>> OID toIndex(boolean implied_length);
>>
>>
>>
> These methods will also be added to v1.7. It is a natural property of
> many SMI values
> to be able to be converted to/from an index.
>
The interface of Variable in v1.7 will look like:
/**
* Converts the value of this <code>Variable</code> to a (sub-)index
* value.
* @param impliedLength
* specifies if the sub-index has an implied length. This parameter
applies
* to variable length variables only (e.g. {@link OctetString} and
* {@link OID}). For other variables it has no effect.
* @return
* an OID that represents this value as an (sub-)index.
* @throws UnsupportedOperationException
* if this variable cannot be used in an index.
* @since 1.7
*/
public abstract OID toSubIndex(boolean impliedLength);
/**
* Sets the value of this <code>Variable</code> from the supplied
(sub-)index.
* @param subIndex
* the sub-index OID.
* @param impliedLength
* specifies if the sub-index has an implied length. This parameter
applies
* to variable length variables only (e.g. {@link OctetString} and
* {@link OID}). For other variables it has no effect.
* @throws UnsupportedOperationException
* if this variable cannot be used in an index.
* @since 1.7
*/
public abstract void fromSubIndex(OID subIndex, boolean impliedLength);
Any objections?
Best regards,
Frank
More information about the SNMP4J
mailing list