[SNMP4J] getTable for Rows

[Fabian Nart]

Hi Marco

 >  >You have to use the indexes only.
 >
 > Thank you but... it does not seem to work. I've written this code:
 >
 > results = table.getTable(device, indexes,
 >                          new OID((String) (tableEntryOid + "." + 
indexOid)),
 >                          null);
 >
 > using a full OID... and it worked. It did not when I used the simple 
index number.

That's strange because I use it with the index only -- which is 
according to the javadoc of that method.

Use the following:

int index= 5; // for example
OID lower= new OID(""+index-1);
OID upper= new OID(""+index);
results = table.getTable(device, indexes, lower, upper);

Fabian

Marco.Bresciani at alcatel.it wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 	*Fabian Nart <fabian.nart at ergon.ch>*
> Sent by: snmp4j-bounces at agentpp.org
> 
> 21/03/2006 09.37
> 
> 	       
>         To:        snmp4j at agentpp.org
>         cc:        
>         Subject:        Re: [SNMP4J] getTable for Rows
> 
> 
>  >Ciao Marco
> 
> :-) Ciao,
> 
>  > > but... how can I use
>  > > lowerBoundIndex and upperBoundIndex? Do I have to use the single
>  >index value? Do I have to use the complete OID?!
>  >
>  >You have to use the indexes only.
> 
> Thank you but... it does not seem to work. I've written this code:
> 
> results = table.getTable(device, indexes,
>                          new OID((String) (tableEntryOid + "." + 
> indexOid)),
>                          null);
> 
> using a full OID... and it worked. It did not when I used the simple 
> index number.
> 
>  > > /* table GETting */
>  > > results = table.getTable(device, indexes, new OID((String) (indexOid
>  >+ 1)), new OID((String) (indexOid)));
>  >
>  >Look carefully at the signature of the method you call:
>  >getTable(Target target, OID[] columnOIDs, OID lowerBoundIndex, OID
>  >upperBoundIndex)
>  >
>  >The third argument is LOWERboundIndex, the fourth is UPPERboundIndex,
>  >you are using it the other way round.
> 
> Thank you! So, to retrieve "rowIndex" I have to use "rowIndex - 1" as 
> lowerBound and "rowIndex" as upperBound... right?!
> 
> Thank you for any help... I'm in a hurry to end this feature only and 
> then I've finished my huge conversion from a proprietary (and very 
> heavy-weighted) solution to SNMP4J! I have to finish today! =8-O
> 
> Marco