[SNMP4J] snmp vs jmx

Frank Fock fock at agentpp.com
Tue Oct 24 23:29:19 CEST 2006


The generic JMX API is still under construction,
however this week the first table (read-only) and scalar
instrumentation has been successfully implemented.

I think I will need some more weeks to make the API
complete and clean.

Best regards,
Frank

Torsten Curdt wrote:
>> > > We need to monitor a couple of machines and I am currently evaluating
>> > > on how to do that best. For many reasons SNMP would be the first
>> > > joice. On the other hand the JVM already exposes many information via
>> > > JMX. How much work is left for the JMX-SNMP bridge?
>> >
>> > I am currently developing an add-on API for SNMP4J-Agent
>> > that facilitates integrating JMX with the agent instrumentation.
>> > As a proof of concept I am implementing the JVM-MANAGEMENT-MIB
>> > with that API and without it (thus directly with SNMP4J-Agent
>> > MO* objects and AgenPro generated stubs).
>>
>> Sounds good
> 
> Frank any news on that?
> 
> cheers
> -- 
> Torsten
> _______________________________________________
> SNMP4J mailing list
> SNMP4J at agentpp.org
> http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j

-- 
AGENT++
http://www.agentpp.com
http://www.mibexplorer.com
http://www.mibdesigner.com




More information about the SNMP4J mailing list