[SNMP4J] Is this a bug?

[Rory Marquis]

Hi Frank

I am indeed using SNMPv1. I have altered the code.

It could also be a bug, the device in question is pretty rubbish, will only 
accept SNMPv1 *sigh*.

Thanks for the speedy response, and thanks for all the great work you guys 
have done on SNMP4J, I have to say I think it is excellent.

Kind Regards
Rory



>From: Frank Fock <fock at agentpp.com>
>To: Rory Marquis <roridge at hotmail.com>
>CC: snmp4j at agentpp.org
>Subject: Re: [SNMP4J] Is this a bug?
>Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:56:06 +0200
>
>Hi Rory,
>
>This is not a bug it is a feature - if you are using SNMPv1.
>Otherwise it would be a bug of the networks device's agent.
>
>Best regards,
>Frank
>
>
>Rory Marquis wrote:
>>Hi Guys
>>
>>I have been playing with your SNMP4J for a little project I have in my 
>>mind.
>>
>>However, I am having an Issue with the GET functionality when sending more 
>>than one parameter, and I was wondering if you could confirm whether this 
>>is accurate.
>>
>>When sending a GET SNMP message to a network device, and adding more than 
>>one OID to the PDU  using, but one of the OIDs is an invalid, in the 
>>response ALL the values are NULL, but no exceptions 
>>"variable.isException()".
>>
>>Is this supposed to happen? Am I doing something wrong?
>>
>>Kind Regards
>>Rory
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>SNMP4J mailing list
>>SNMP4J at agentpp.org
>>http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
>
>--
>AGENT++
>http://www.agentpp.com
>http://www.mibexplorer.com
>http://www.mibdesigner.com
>