[SNMP4J] Reducing temporary object allocations for SNMP4j

Iker Almandoz ikeralmandoz.lists at gmail.com
Fri Jul 11 22:30:00 CEST 2008


Hi Frank, 

 

I am using SNMP4j to collect huge amounts of SNMP data (approximately 3200
Million OIDs per day) as part of a commercial application.

 

When I create VariableBinding objects, both the OID object and the Variable
objects get cloned which essentially means that I'm creating 3200 Million
additional OID objects (with their corresponding int arrays) as well as
3200Million new Variable objects.   I'm solving this currently by extending
both Variable and OID to return a reference to themselves in the clone()
method and by having a single Null() object such that I don't get a new one
for each VariableBinding. 

Is there any way inside of SNMP4j we could use to avoid creating so many
temporaries ?

We would prefer to not use workarounds outside of SNMP4j such that we can
remain fully compatible with the library to be able to benefit from the
latest updates.

 

The garbage collection has become our current bottleneck in our
implementation where in terms of object creation in bytes we get:

48.3% int[] (from OID objects)

7.2% BER$MutableByte

6.7% OID

4.5% VariableBinding

3% Integer32.

2.2% Null

 

We would be interested in getting support from you on this and other issues
are we are considering on signing for the "SNMP4J annual email support
package". 

 

Best regards, 
Iker




More information about the SNMP4J mailing list