[SNMP4J] Sending INFORMs to an engine that changes engine ID
Frank Fock
fock at agentpp.com
Tue Apr 28 22:40:00 CEST 2009
Hi,
Jochen Katz wrote:
>
>> The current implementation of snmp4j does not support resynchronization in
>> this case; my question is: should it?
>
> No. If you have a device that changes its engine id, this can and should
> be solved by the application. The MPv3 offers functions to add, get and
> remove known engine ids, same for the USM.
>
I agree with Jochen. The reason for not doing an
auto rediscovery is security! If you would do so,
a man-in-middle attack would be very easy!
Best regards,
Frank
--
AGENT++
http://www.agentpp.com
http://www.snmp4j.com
http://www.mibexplorer.com
http://www.mibdesigner.com
More information about the SNMP4J
mailing list