[SNMP4J] Sending INFORMs to an engine that changes engine ID

Frank Fock fock at agentpp.com
Tue Apr 28 22:40:00 CEST 2009


Hi,

Jochen Katz wrote:
> 
>> The current implementation of snmp4j does not support resynchronization in
>> this case; my question is: should it?
> 
> No. If you have a device that changes its engine id, this can and should
> be solved by the application. The MPv3 offers functions to add, get and
> remove known engine ids, same for the USM.
> 

I agree with Jochen. The reason for not doing an
auto rediscovery is security! If you would do so,
a man-in-middle attack would be very easy!

Best regards,
Frank


-- 
AGENT++
http://www.agentpp.com
http://www.snmp4j.com
http://www.mibexplorer.com
http://www.mibdesigner.com




More information about the SNMP4J mailing list