[SNMP4J] Two Snmp, one TransportMapping cause IOException

[Robert Mycek]

Hi,

- I must use UDP transport
- I must bind socket to specific localAddress:port (requirement, can`t
change it).
- I must do snmp set to different client and it must be v3, authPriv
and user: "snmpUser"
but each set may have different auth/privPasswords.
- Two or more simultaneously snmp set to the same remoteAddress:port
with different auth/priv passwords are possible.
- Remote engineId is unknown (have to be discovered).

QUESTION:
Is it possible to do it with one instance of Snmp (with one TransportMapping)?

RM


On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Frank Fock <fock at agentpp.com> wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> This is not an error in the code. If you use a transport
> mapping with two Snmp instances (thus also two MessageDispatchers)
> then you get a problem with processing a response with
> the right MessageDispatcher instance.
>
> Like
> https://server.oosnmp.net/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=1441794
> suggest, you will need to implement your own MessageDispatcher
> to avoid redundant processing.
>
> Why are you using two Snmp instances at all?
>
> Regards,
> Frank