[SNMP4J] [SNMP4J SNMP over TCP

[Frank Fock]

Hi,

DefaultTcpTransportMapping obviously supports variant A.
B is not supported and I do not know what you need
to do for B.

Best regards,
Frank

On 03.03.2010 15:22, Moller, Hermann (NSN - DE/Munich) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there are different possibilities for SNMP over TCP, which include:
>
> A) along RFC3430, which basically means to send the BER-encoded SNMP PDU
> over a TCP connection
> B) along RFC3417, using SNMP over OSI : this specifies how to use an OSI
> connection-less transport service for exchange of SNMP PDUs,
>      and then applying RFC1006 (ISO Transport Service on top of the TCP),
> yielding together "SNMP over TCP" again.
>
> Is it correct to say that
> - the DefaultTcpTransportMapping implementation supports variant A)  ?
> - the DefaultTcpTransportMapping implementation does not support variant
> B) ?
>
> If above assumptions are true,
> what would be needed in order to implement a manager that can support
> variant B?
>
> I am new to the list, so please apologize if this topic has been handled
> already.
>
> br, Hermann
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SNMP4J mailing list
> SNMP4J at agentpp.org
> http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j

-- 
AGENT++
http://www.agentpp.com
http://www.snmp4j.com
http://www.mibexplorer.com
http://www.mibdesigner.com