[SNMP4J] Another race condition fix forDefaultUdpTransportMapping
Tosoni
jp.tosoni at acksys.fr
Mon Sep 27 09:38:18 CEST 2010
Sorry guys, but I don't believe your tries fix the race for real.
The problem is that a socket.close() can occur just before the
socket.receive()
If you just test the socket value, this does not forbit a socket.close()
happening *after*
your test and *before* the socket.receive().> > try {
> > DatagramSocket socketCopy = socket;
> > if (socketCopy == null) {
> > stop = true;
> > continue;
> > }
*** what if another thread closes at this point ? ***
> > socketCopy.receive(packet);
> > }
The real fix must use some semaphore or mutex which embraces:
on one hand, both the test of 'socket==null' and the receive()
on the other hand, both the change 'socket=null' and the close()
My own try (I do not suggest it as a correct fix) is a quick-and-dirty:
try {
socket.receive(packet);
}
catch (InterruptedIOException iiox) {
if (iiox.bytesTransferred <= 0) {
continue;
}
}
+ // UGLY FIX: socket close/receive synchro
+ catch (NullPointerException iiox) {
+ // This handles the close race (stop=false but socket=null)
+ continue;
+ }
Hmm, also, there is another race condition which happens sometimes, here:
public void run() {
try {
here===> socket.setSoTimeout(getSocketTimeout());
Really I guess it can happen everywhere 'socket' is used in a thread
different than the closing thread...
Regards
> -----Original Message-----
> From: snmp4j-bounces at agentpp.org [mailto:snmp4j-bounces at agentpp.org]On
> Behalf Of Paul Marquis
> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 1:32 AM
> To: Frank Fock
> Cc: snmp4j at agentpp.org
> Subject: Re: [SNMP4J] Another race condition fix
> forDefaultUdpTransportMapping
>
>
> Thanks for fixing this!
>
> Any idea when there will be an official release with this fix
> in it?
> I just joined the list, so if you've already discussed when the next
> release will be available, I apologize.
>
> On Sep 23, 2010, at 7:24 PM, Frank Fock wrote:
>
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > Thank you for the bug report. If fixed it a bit different:
> >
> > try {
> > DatagramSocket socketCopy = socket;
> > if (socketCopy == null) {
> > stop = true;
> > continue;
> > }
> > socketCopy.receive(packet);
> > }
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Frank
> >
> > On 23.09.2010 23:44, Paul Marquis wrote:
> >> Version 1.11.1 of SNMP4J included a fix for a race condition in
> >> DefautlUdpTrasnportMapping which caused a NullPointerException.
> >> However, there is still one that remains while attempting to read a
> >> packet and I see this from time to time. Below is a patch
> that fixes
> >> the problem for me that I'd like to submit for review.
> >>
> >> Index: src/org/snmp4j/transport/DefaultUdpTransportMapping.java
> >> ===================================================================
> >> ---
> src/org/snmp4j/transport/DefaultUdpTransportMapping.java
> >> (revision
> >> 215)
> >> +++
> src/org/snmp4j/transport/DefaultUdpTransportMapping.java (working
> >> copy)
> >> @@ -337,7 +337,11 @@
> >>
> >> udpAddress.getPort());
> >> try {
> >> try {
> >> - socket.receive(packet);
> >> + DatagramSocket readingSocket = socket;
> >> + if (readingSocket == null) {
> >> + continue;
> >> + }
> >> + readingSocket.receive(packet);
> >> }
> >> catch (InterruptedIOException iiox) {
> >> if (iiox.bytesTransferred<= 0) {
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> SNMP4J mailing list
> >> SNMP4J at agentpp.org
> >> http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
> >
> > --
> > AGENT++
> > http://www.agentpp.com
> > http://www.snmp4j.com
> > http://www.mibexplorer.com
> > http://www.mibdesigner.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SNMP4J mailing list
> > SNMP4J at agentpp.org
> > http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
>
> _______________________________________________
> SNMP4J mailing list
> SNMP4J at agentpp.org
> http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
>
More information about the SNMP4J
mailing list