[SNMP4J] Fwd: Question on SNMP 1.11.2

[Prathib Kumar]

Frank/All,

is there any way I can tell to SNMP4J to use different socket address for
IPV4 and IPV6 ?  Since its very clear that its a mix of IPV4 and IPV6, if
there a way to tell, then it would be great or am I missing anything ?

Regards
Prathib Kumar.





On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Prathib Kumar <kgprathib at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes frank, the object itself is not changed.
>
> What kind of problems do you think in JDK or in RHEL ? I searched in the
> net with this error and couldnt get anything of this sort ?
>
> We use java 1.7.0_40 version and RHEL 5.10
>
> Are you aware of any similar issues ?
>
> Regards
> Prathib Kumar.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Frank Fock <fock at agentpp.com> wrote:
>
>>  Hi,
>>
>> If the target object is not changed itself then it will be OK.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Frank
>>
>> Am 15.01.2014 22:01, schrieb Prathib Kumar:
>>
>> Hi Frank,
>>
>>  Thanks for your response. I corrected the alias name.
>>
>>  We use target object as the class member variable in our code, after we
>> pass the target object to the snmp4j, it might be possible that targetObj
>> might be re-initialized with the different target object for a different
>> device.
>>
>>  I think that shouldnt be a problem rite ?
>>
>>  Regards
>> Prathib Kumar.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Frank Fock <fock at agentpp.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  Hi Prathib,
>>>
>>> First of all, the email address of the SNMP4J mailing list is
>>> snmp4j at agentpp.org
>>>
>>> This might be an issue with your JDK or operating system, if
>>> you do not modify the Target object while a request is being
>>> processed by SNMP4J.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Frank
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>  We are using SNMP4J 1.11.2 in our product and our product runs on
>>>> RHEL 5.10.
>>>>
>>>>  So far, we have supported only IPV4 and now we started supporting
>>>> IPV6 and we are getting the following exception only when we query the IPV6
>>>> and IPV4 parallely.
>>>>
>>>>  If we have only IPV4 devices in our product, then we dont see this
>>>> issue. If we have mix of both IPV4 and IPV6, then we hit upon this issue.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Hence I went thru the SNMP4J source code and got a question that
>>>> whether sendPDU() in Snmp is thread safe ? I read the FAQ and found that it
>>>> says its thread safe.
>>>>
>>>>  Since ours is multithreaded environment, any idea what could have
>>>> caused this issue ?
>>>>
>>>>  *Exception Trace :*
>>>>  Caused by: org.snmp4j.MessageException:* Address family not supported
>>>> by protocol*
>>>>         at
>>>> org.snmp4j.MessageDispatcherImpl.sendPdu(MessageDispatcherImpl.java:494)
>>>>         at
>>>> org.snmp4j.util.MultiThreadedMessageDispatcher.sendPdu(MultiThreadedMessageDispatcher.java:146)
>>>>         at org.snmp4j.Snmp.sendMessage(Snmp.java:1082)
>>>>         at org.snmp4j.Snmp.send(Snmp.java:971)
>>>>         at org.snmp4j.Snmp.send(Snmp.java:955)
>>>>         at
>>>> com.cisco.xmp.snmp.sessionmgr.async.ResponseFuture.internalSend(ResponseFuture.java:103)
>>>>         at
>>>> com.cisco.xmp.snmp.sessionmgr.async.ResponseFuture.start(ResponseFuture.java:140)
>>>>
>>>>  Please let me know if you need any other info.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Regards
>>>>  Prathib Kumar.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   --
>>> ---
>>> AGENT++
>>> Maximilian-Kolbe-Str. 10
>>> 73257 Koengen, Germanyhttps://agentpp.com
>>> Phone: +49 7024 8688230
>>> Fax:   +49 7024 8688231
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> ---
>> AGENT++
>> Maximilian-Kolbe-Str. 10
>> 73257 Koengen, Germanyhttps://agentpp.com
>> Phone: +49 7024 8688230
>> Fax:   +49 7024 8688231
>>
>>
>