[SNMP4J] Wrong SNMP Enterprise parsed from trap by SNMP4j

Chatterjee, Soumya Subhra SoumyaSubhra.Chatterjee at ca.com
Thu Jan 23 13:17:55 CET 2014


Hi Frank

Here is the hex dump of the trap.

Trap data: 30:81:E1:02:01:00:04:06:70:75:62:6C:69:63:A4:81:D3:06:04:91:6D:7A:27:
40:04:7F:00:00:01:02:01:01:02:01:00:43:01:00:30:81:BB:30:1C:06:05:91:6D:7A:27:01
:04:13:32:30:31:34:2D:30:31:2D:31:35:54:31:30:3A:34:30:3A:33:34:30:12:06:05:91:6
D:7A:27:02:04:09:57:53:44:31:32:32:37:35:39:30:0F:06:05:91:6D:7A:27:03:04:06:6C:
30:32:31:34:30:30:15:06:05:91:6D:7A:27:04:04:0C:44:65:66:61:75:6C:74:47:72:6F:75
:70:30:14:06:05:91:6D:7A:27:05:04:0B:44:65:76:69:73:41:75:74:6F:2D:31:30:1B:06:0
5:91:6D:7A:27:06:04:12:44:65:66:61:75:6C:74:54:72:61:6E:73:61:63:74:69:6F:6E:30:
2C:06:05:91:6D:7A:27:07:04:23:54:69:6D:65:6F:75:74:5F:6F:63:63:75:72:72:65:64:5F
:77:61:69:74:69:6E:67:5F:66:6F:72:5F:6F:62:6A:65:63:74

If you want, I can also provide the Wireshark capture file for the trap.

Soumya Subhra Chatterjee
CA Technologies
Associate Software Engineer
Tel:  +914066877206
SoumyaSubhra.Chatterjee at ca.com

                           
 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

-----Original Message-----
From: snmp4j-bounces at agentpp.org [mailto:snmp4j-bounces at agentpp.org] On Behalf Of Frank Fock
Sent: 23 January 2014 5:27 AM
To: snmp4j at agentpp.org
Subject: Re: [SNMP4J] Wrong SNMP Enterprise parsed from trap by SNMP4j

Hi Soumya,

You can send the hexdump of the trap PDU to support at snmp4j.org.
There is no known issue. Some devices/agents implement a wrong length encoding of BER elements, but its not clear what could have caused that issue from the facts your provided.

Best regards,
Frank

Am 22.01.2014 10:20, schrieb Chatterjee, Soumya Subhra:
> Hi all/Frank
>
> Recently I came across traps (v1) by Appsmon application. Capturing 
> the packet using Wireshark and examining its properties gives an 
> Enterprise OID of 2.2205.122.39 but when SNMP4j parses the trap the 
> same comes out as 57.5.122.39
>
> Why are the values coming out to be different? Is there any known issue about it?
>
> If you want to take a look at it, I can provide code snippets, wireshark capture of the trap, and screenshots, if you can give a location/email id where I can provide that.
>
> Soumya Subhra Chatterjee
> CA Technologies
> Associate Software Engineer
> Tel:  +914066877206
> SoumyaSubhra.Chatterjee at ca.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> SNMP4J mailing list
> SNMP4J at agentpp.org
> https://s16675406.onlinehome-server.info/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j

--
---
AGENT++
Maximilian-Kolbe-Str. 10
73257 Koengen, Germany
https://agentpp.com
Phone: +49 7024 8688230
Fax:   +49 7024 8688231

_______________________________________________
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J at agentpp.org
https://s16675406.onlinehome-server.info/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j


More information about the SNMP4J mailing list