[SNMP4J] USMTable and thread safety

[Girish Venkatasubramanian]

Hi Frank.
Yes, I had the incorrect class name. Thanks for pointing that out.

The class I was asking about was USMUserTable. Same questions however.

Thanks
Girish


On Sun, Mar 10, 2019, 8:59 AM Frank Fock <fock at agentpp.com> wrote:

> Hello Girish,
>
> A class USMTable does not exists in SNMP4J. Do you meant another class or
> is this class from a third party?
>
> Best regards,
> Frank
>
> > On 8. Mar 2019, at 16:57, Girish Venkatasubramanian <girishvs at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello
> > I was wondering if the USMTable is thread safe.
> >
> > I see that the USMTable uses a TreeMap which itself is not synchronized
> > (say, unlike a concurrent hash map).
> >
> > Even though the functions that access it are synchronized it would not
> > prevent a scenario where one thread is calling removeAllUsers() and
> another
> > thread is invoking addUser() - yes ? Is there some synchronization
> > mechanism that I am missing ?
> >
> > Would appreciate your response.
> > Thanks
> > Girish
> > _______________________________________________
> > SNMP4J mailing list
> > SNMP4J at agentpp.org
> > https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
>
>