MibProxy based on table index

[Frank Fock]

Chris Paulsen wrote:

> This seems to work fine, but I still need to ensure that this is
> threadsafe. Is the thread safety of the lastNext VB assured by the fact
> that each sub-request is processed on its own thread with a snapshot of
> MibProxy class at the point the thread is started? If so then this should
> also apply to my values...
>

Yes, each request is executed in its own thread and subrequests
are processed sequently within that thread.

> Is there any thought to adding proxy by row abilities to the MibProxy
> class? I know this is something that Sun's SEA package provides. Maybe they
> added this instead of support for SNMPv2c or v3...;-)
>

This is accomplished by the MibProxyV3 class.

>
> Thanks for enduring my ramblings.
>

No problem ;-)

Best regards,
Frank

--
Frank Fock - AGENT++
Email: frank____fock.de
Fax: +49 7195 177108