Subagent context question

[Frank Fock]

Mike,

You are right. There is an inconsistent view setup in some examples.
I will fix that. Thanks for sorting this out.

Best regards,
Frank

Mike Carr wrote:

> Jochen, thanks for the reply but it doesn't appear to work.  I've tried it
> on both a Windows 2000 and Linux (SuSE 7.2) build which return the same
> result "SNMP++ GetNext Error, SNMP: Cannot perform operation, Authorization
> Error".
>
> After looking into the code it's failing because the function
> VacmAccessTable::getViewName is copmaring a prefix (I don't know what that
> is?) which is an empty string to a context that contains "subagent" (which I
> was expecting & understand).
>
> By changing the code in the 'main' function of the master agent so that the
> 'testGroup' has a prefix that matches the context it does however work.
>
> i.e. changing the line to that below:
>         vacm->addNewAccessEntry("testGroup", "subagent", // <--- changed
> this to "subagent"
>                                 SecurityModel_USM, SecurityLevel_authPriv,
>                                 match_prefix,
>                                 "testView", "testView",
>                                 "testView", storageType_nonVolatile);
>
> Could you confirm whether this is indeed a bug or that I'm still
> mis-understanding something?