[AGENT++] SNMP++ advocacy

[gpuchtel at gplicity.com]

I echo the sentiments of Marek so there is no reason to repeat them here. 
When I chose Agent++ several years ago I naturally considered net-snmp but
as you pointed out one only has to look at the code base to make a
technical decision.  I can give you 3 other (non-technical) reasons to use
Agent++:

1)	Frank Fock
2)	Jochen Katz
3)	Other members of this community who are dedicated to its success

Frank and Jochen consistently keep this library close to the
state-of-the-art of the SNMP protocol far sooner and more reliable than
net-snmp, for example; consider the implementation of the AgentX protocol
as a case in point.

Finally, don’t forget the suite of tools (MIB Explorer, MIB Designer, Agen
Pro, etc
) provided them.

Regards,
Glenn 


Original Message:
-----------------
From: arun akumars at omnesysindia.com
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:18:11 +0530
To: agentpp at agentpp.org
Subject: [AGENT++] SNMP++ advocacy


Hi,

I have been looking out for an SNMP library for one of our products.
And i have settled onto SNMP++ especially due to its beautiful API
neat code base, windows support (all other implementations seemed
to lack here) and multi-threading safety.

Now i need some more reasons to push my decision, espeically when it
comes to justifying SNMP++ over net-snmp.

For obvious reasons i could not post this question in the comp.protocol.snmp
newsgroup. I hope some one will provide me with some convincing
asnwers here, as to why people here have chosen SNMP++ over other
comparable implementations.

Thanks a lot.
Arun


**

_______________________________________________
AGENTPP mailing list
AGENTPP at agentpp.org
http://agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/agentpp

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .