[AGENT++] Unneeded code in Snmp class
Dave White | Networking
dave.white at efi.com
Mon Sep 15 19:15:15 CEST 2008
Hi Jochen,
Yes, we use this constructor in our implementation. I added an Snmpx constructor that looks like this. It is used by our listener.
Snmpx(int &status, const UdpAddress& addr_v4, const UdpAddress& addr_v6):
Snmp(status, addr_v4, addr_v6) { }
Regards,
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: agentpp-bounces at agentpp.org [mailto:agentpp-bounces at agentpp.org] On Behalf Of Jochen Katz
Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2008 1:03 PM
To: agent++
Subject: [AGENT++] Unneeded code in Snmp class
Hi,
does anyone use this constructor of Snmp class:
Snmp(int &status, const UdpAddress& addr_v4,
const UdpAddress& addr_v6);
For me, this constructor has no use case in real applications, but just
makes the Snmp class complex.
So if you use this constructor, say it now...
Regards,
Jochen
_______________________________________________
AGENTPP mailing list
AGENTPP at agentpp.org
http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/agentpp
More information about the AGENTPP
mailing list