[SNMP4J] SMIConstants: interface or class?

Beton, Richard richard.beton at roke.co.uk
Tue May 11 10:15:51 CEST 2004


Guy Katz wrote:

>also, i must say that i am not sure this mailing list is for critisizing
>architectures. this list os for questions relating to SNMP4J. its one thing
>to say "hi, i would appreciate it if this feature might be considered" and
>another thing to say that "this class should be like what i am saying" which
>is the vibe i got from the email regarding this issue. ...


Forgive me for treading on toes.  I hoped my comments would be seen as
constructive criticism.  I am not trying to rock the boat, just raise
suggestions for possible improvement.  I wasn't aware of a better forum
for making these points.

Rick :-)




-- 

Visit our website at www.roke.co.uk

Registered Office: Roke Manor Research Ltd, Siemens House, Oldbury, Bracknell,
Berkshire. RG12 8FZ

The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential to
Roke Manor Research Ltd and must not be passed to any third party without
permission. This communication is for information only and shall not create or
change any contractual relationship.




More information about the SNMP4J mailing list