[SNMP4J] SMIConstants: interface or class?

[Guy Katz]

like I said; I am not the moderator of this list and not a part of the
SNMP4J team so I am not speaking for them here. frank did not seem to mind
your architecture comments.
be sure its nothing personal Richard. its just my opinion on the subject in
general.
by the way, you can contribute your knowledge by joining one of the many
open source projects if you can spare the time...
I myself have wanted to do this for a while and hope I can someday give back
to the community for the magnificent open source code that is out there.

-----Original Message-----
From: Beton, Richard [mailto:richard.beton at roke.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 10:16 AM
To: snmp4j at agentpp.org
Subject: Re: [SNMP4J] SMIConstants: interface or class?


Guy Katz wrote:

>also, i must say that i am not sure this mailing list is for critisizing
>architectures. this list os for questions relating to SNMP4J. its one thing
>to say "hi, i would appreciate it if this feature might be considered" and
>another thing to say that "this class should be like what i am saying"
which
>is the vibe i got from the email regarding this issue. ...


Forgive me for treading on toes.  I hoped my comments would be seen as
constructive criticism.  I am not trying to rock the boat, just raise
suggestions for possible improvement.  I wasn't aware of a better forum
for making these points.

Rick :-)




-- 

Visit our website at www.roke.co.uk

Registered Office: Roke Manor Research Ltd, Siemens House, Oldbury,
Bracknell,
Berkshire. RG12 8FZ

The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential
to
Roke Manor Research Ltd and must not be passed to any third party without
permission. This communication is for information only and shall not create
or
change any contractual relationship.

_______________________________________________
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J at agentpp.org
http://p15141779.pureserver.info/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j