[SNMP4J] About UGLI and log4j

[Ronald.Madsen at utstar.com]

I agree and would have preferred a different logging model all together -
something more along the lines of a package-specific callback interface
passed when constructing an Snmp() instance.  "null" is OK if you don't
want any logging., or I could implement the interface to use my logger.

Many applications already have a logging facility and integrating log4j
just adds unnecessary complexity to get both to behave nicely in the same
app.

Just my opinion.

Regards,
Ron





Fabrice Bacchella <fabrice.bacchella at 9online.fr>@agentpp.org on 04/01/2005
09:07:10 AM

Sent by:    snmp4j-bounces at agentpp.org


To:    snmp4j at agentpp.org
cc:
Subject:    [SNMP4J] About UGLI and log4j


Wasn't the switch to log4j 1.3 a litte to fast ?

It's still in alpha, not even beta, stage and there is still a lot of
works to do. For example, DailyRollingFileAppender is missing, and
chainsaw too, amongst a lot of other things.

And I'm now in trouble, because when I update snmp4j, I didn't kept the
old version, which is not available to download. Can some one tell me
where I can find it ?

--
petite bibliothèque de curiosités à l'usage des explorateurs de
l'imaginaire
www.castalie.fr
_______________________________________________
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J at agentpp.org
 http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j