[SNMP4J] About UGLI and log4j

[Frank Fock]

Hi Ron,

OK, since there are many complains I will implement a logger
interface for SNMP4J that allows to specify a logging factory
through a static method.
By default there will be no logging used. The changes will go
into v1.2.1 which will be available on Monday.

Best regards,
Frank

Ronald.Madsen at utstar.com wrote:

>I agree and would have preferred a different logging model all together -
>something more along the lines of a package-specific callback interface
>passed when constructing an Snmp() instance.  "null" is OK if you don't
>want any logging., or I could implement the interface to use my logger.
>
>Many applications already have a logging facility and integrating log4j
>just adds unnecessary complexity to get both to behave nicely in the same
>app.
>
>Just my opinion.
>
>Regards,
>Ron
>
>
>
>
>
>Fabrice Bacchella <fabrice.bacchella at 9online.fr>@agentpp.org on 04/01/2005
>09:07:10 AM
>
>Sent by:    snmp4j-bounces at agentpp.org
>
>
>To:    snmp4j at agentpp.org
>cc:
>Subject:    [SNMP4J] About UGLI and log4j
>
>
>Wasn't the switch to log4j 1.3 a litte to fast ?
>
>It's still in alpha, not even beta, stage and there is still a lot of
>works to do. For example, DailyRollingFileAppender is missing, and
>chainsaw too, amongst a lot of other things.
>
>And I'm now in trouble, because when I update snmp4j, I didn't kept the
>old version, which is not available to download. Can some one tell me
>where I can find it ?
>
>--
>petite bibliothèque de curiosités à l'usage des explorateurs de
>l'imaginaire
>www.castalie.fr
>_______________________________________________
>SNMP4J mailing list
>SNMP4J at agentpp.org
> http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
>
>
>  
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>SNMP4J mailing list
>SNMP4J at agentpp.org
>http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
>  
>