[SNMP4J] Engine time synchronization question

[Frank Fock]

You may experiencing the bug that has been fixed in v1.2 RC 1 with
the following change log entry:
* Fixed: notInTimeWindow report was sent with wrong
  securityLevel (should be authNoPriv - was noAuthNoPriv).

You may either make a diff on the USM.java file to see what needs to
be changed, or wait until v1.2 RC2 is released, which should be available
within the next 24h for download. I do not recommend using 1.2 RC1
because that version used the commons logging API which will be
not be used in future versions.

Best regards,
Frank

Ronald.Madsen at utstar.com wrote:

>I'm experimenting writing a SNMPv3 Agent using SNMP4j.
>
>My "Manager" sends a normal Request to discover the authoritative engineID
>- SNMP4j responds with a REPORT with its engineID just fine.
>
>The Manager then sends an authorative Request to discover the engineBoots
>and engineTime - SNMP4j responds with a REPORT with both engineBoots and
>engineTime set to zero.
>
>Subsequent transations eventually Report "not in time window".
>
>I searched the SNMP4j archives and did not find a similar discussion.
>
>I may very well be using SNMP4j incorrectly.
>
>Does anyone have a small snippet fo code that properly initializes Snmp,
>USM, etc.  correctly?
>
>Thanks,
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>SNMP4J mailing list
>SNMP4J at agentpp.org
>http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
>
>  
>