[SNMP4J] Re: Dependant table row not removed
Frank Fock
fock at agentpp.com
Wed Aug 22 23:50:31 CEST 2007
Hi Senthil,
Thanks for reporting this issue. It will be fixed
in the next release. Of course, the table model
should not be used directly if not needed.
Best regards,
Frank
Senthil Muniswamy wrote:
> Frank,
>
> Adding a row to a base table (e.g. snmpTargetAddrTable) adds a row in
> the dependent table (e.g. snmpTargetAddrExtTable). But, removing a row
> from base table does not remove the row from dependent table.
>
> Reason was some MIB implementations (e.g. SnmpTargetMIB) removes the
> row directly from the TableModel instead of from the Table that
> handles the RelationShipListener.
>
> -Senthil
--
AGENT++
http://www.agentpp.com
http://www.mibexplorer.com
http://www.mibdesigner.com
More information about the SNMP4J
mailing list