[SNMP4J] Problem with DefaultTCPTransportMapping

Frank Fock fock at agentpp.com
Thu Oct 1 23:39:13 CEST 2009


Hi Brice,

The stack traces of 8) and 10) would help.

Best regards,
Frank

Brice Fines wrote:
> Hi Frank,
> 
> Please let me know if you need more information to reproduce it.
> 
> I made further tests.
> 
> I checked with previous releases, but I have the same problem using SNMP4J 
> version 1.10.0 or 1.9.3d.
> 
> I make sure that commands over TCP are working (I mean not only the first 
> one) with the following sequence:
> 1) send GET command to client 1 that is listenning over TCP.
> 2) get GET response from client 1 over TCP.
> 3) send GET command to client 2 that is listenning over TCP.
> 4) get GET response from client 2 over TCP.
> 5) send GET command to client 3 that is listenning over TCP.
> 6) get GET response from client 3 over TCP.
> 7) send GET command to client 4 that is not listenning over TCP.
> 8) get java.net.ConnectExecption in DefaultTCPTransportMapping.
> 9) send GET command to client 1 again.
> 10) get java.nio.ClosedChannelExceptionin DefaultTCPTransportMapping.
> 
> I also modified my class to send SNMP commands over UDP instead of TCP 
> (i.e. DefaultUdpTransportMapping and UDP addresses) , and everything runs 
> ok  (i.e. the clients that were working keep answering after failing to 
> contact another client). So the problem seems to occurs only with 
> DefaultTCPTransportMapping.
> 
> Thanks for the support. I hope this can be solved soon.
> 
> Regards
> _______________________________________________
> SNMP4J mailing list
> SNMP4J at agentpp.org
> http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j

-- 
AGENT++
http://www.agentpp.com
http://www.snmp4j.com
http://www.mibexplorer.com
http://www.mibdesigner.com




More information about the SNMP4J mailing list