[SNMP4J] Agent(X)-API status

[Gregor Rosenauer]

Frank Fock wrote:
> If you want to implement a AgentX subagent in Java, then you probably
> do not need SNMP4J at all. There seem to be at least one free
> implementation for AgentX in Java, but I do not know how stable/complete
> they are.
Thank you for your quick reply. Just for your information:
We have initially planned to use JAgentX, which you were probably 
referring to in your answer, but as it only supports SNMPv1 and 
development has practically stopped (unless some other students continue 
work on it), I have searched for alternatives and found SNMP4J.

However I now also think it is a bit too general/complex for our 
specific use so we'll probably stay with the JAgentX-solution for now.

I'll keep following SNMP4J's progress and re-evaluate the situation when 
Agent(X)-support arrives:)

brg,
Gregor